﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--<!DOCTYPE nitf SYSTEM "nitf-3-4.dtd">-->
<nitf>
  <head>
    <title id="Title"></title>
    <docdata management-doc-idref="">
      <date.issue id="CreationDate" norm="" />
      <du-key id="rev-ver" generation="1" version="Default" />
      <du-key id="Parent-Version" version="" />
      <identified-content>
        <classifier id="newspro-nitf" value="r2" />
        <classifier id="Newspro-App" value="Epaper" />
        <classifier id="Content-Type" value="Story" />
        <classifier id="storyID" value="" />
        <classifier id="CmsConID" value="" />
        <classifier id="Desk" value="" />
        <classifier id="Source" value="" />
        <classifier id="Edition" value="" />
        <classifier id="Category" value="-1" />
        <classifier id="UserName" value="" />
        <classifier id="PublicationDate" value="11/09/2026" />
        <classifier id="PublicationName" value="HI" />
        <classifier id="IsPublished" value="Y" />
        <classifier id="IsPlaced" value="Y" />
        <classifier id="IsCompleated" value="N" />
        <classifier id="IsProofed" value="N" />
        <classifier id="User" value="" />
        <classifier id="Headline-Count" value="" />
        <classifier id="Slug-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Photo-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Caption-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Word-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Character-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Location" value="" />
        <classifier id="TemplateType" value="1" />
        <classifier id="StoryType" value="Story" />
        <classifier id="Author" value="" />
        <classifier id="UOM" value="mm" />
        <classifier id="NumCol" value="0" />
        <classifier id="kicker" value="" />
        <classifier id="ByLine" value="" />
        <classifier id="DateLine" value="" />
        <classifier id="box-geometry" value="852,81,955,555" />
        <classifier id="numcol" value="1" />
        <classifier id="ArticleStyle" value="" />
        <classifier id="Layer" value="Default" />
        <classifier id="Epaper-Build" value="7.96.0.0" />
        <classifier id="ProcessingDateTime" value="Fri Sep 11 2026 00:21:20 GMT+0530" />
      </identified-content>
      <urgency id="home-page" ed-urg="0" />
      <urgency id="priority" ed-urg="0" />
      <doc-scope id="scope" value="0" />
    </docdata>
    <pubdata type="print" name="HI" date.publication="20260911T000000+5.30" edition.name="HYD" edition.area="HYD" position.section="11MAIN07FHYD" position.sequence="7" ex-ref="11MAIN07FHYD.indd" />
  </head>
  <body boxBorderWeightColor="" boxBorderWeight="">
    <body.head>
      <hedline>
        <hl1 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline1">
          <lang class="3" style="Headline1" font="Franklin Gothic Demi Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="15">Vikarabad district court site row: HC asks advocates to let administrative process take course </lang>
        </hl1>
      </hedline>
    </body.head>
    <body.content id="Bodytext" CaptionAsBody="0">
      <block>
        <media id="1" media-type="image"></media>
      </block>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Legal correspondent 
Hyderabad</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">TheTelangana High Court on Thursday asked advocates opposing the proposed site for the Vikarabad district court complex to allow the issue to be decided through administrative process, observing that selection of a court site was essentially an administrative exercise.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">The division bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice Ghouse Meera Mohiuddin heard a PIL filed by Vikarabad advocate Bandi Narayana and three others. The petitioners challenged the proposed 10-acre site at Billadakla/Mekalagandi for construction of the 10-plus-2 complex, claiming successive principal district and sessions Judges had found it unsuitable.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">P Varun Reddy, appearing for the petitioners, suggested alternative sites at the horticulture centre in Yennepally and at Shivareddypet. He submitted that the proposed site was low-lying, had deep ditches and uneven ground; was difficult to access. He referred to earlier correspondence from district judges supporting a more convenient location near the railway station and RTC bus-stand.</lang>
      </p>
    </body.content>
  </body>
</nitf>