﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--<!DOCTYPE nitf SYSTEM "nitf-3-4.dtd">-->
<nitf>
  <head>
    <title id="Title">#Title</title>
    <docdata management-doc-idref="">
      <date.issue id="CreationDate" norm="" />
      <du-key id="rev-ver" generation="1" version="Default" />
      <du-key id="Parent-Version" version="" />
      <identified-content>
        <classifier id="newspro-nitf" value="r2" />
        <classifier id="Newspro-App" value="Epaper" />
        <classifier id="Content-Type" value="Story" />
        <classifier id="storyID" value="" />
        <classifier id="CmsConID" value="" />
        <classifier id="Desk" value="" />
        <classifier id="Source" value="" />
        <classifier id="Edition" value="" />
        <classifier id="Category" value="-1" />
        <classifier id="UserName" value="" />
        <classifier id="PublicationDate" value="01/10/2026" />
        <classifier id="PublicationName" value="HI" />
        <classifier id="IsPublished" value="Y" />
        <classifier id="IsPlaced" value="Y" />
        <classifier id="IsCompleated" value="N" />
        <classifier id="IsProofed" value="N" />
        <classifier id="User" value="" />
        <classifier id="Headline-Count" value="" />
        <classifier id="Slug-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Photo-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Caption-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Word-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Character-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Location" value="" />
        <classifier id="TemplateType" value="1" />
        <classifier id="StoryType" value="Story" />
        <classifier id="Author" value="" />
        <classifier id="UOM" value="mm" />
        <classifier id="NumCol" value="0" />
        <classifier id="kicker" value="" />
        <classifier id="ByLine" value="" />
        <classifier id="DateLine" value="" />
        <classifier id="box-geometry" value="36,81,955,331" />
        <classifier id="Layer" value="Default" />
        <classifier id="numcol" value="8" />
        <classifier id="ArticleStyle" value="" />
        <classifier id="Epaper-Build" value="7.96.0.0" />
        <classifier id="ProcessingDateTime" value="Wed Sep 30 2026 22:01:51 GMT+0530" />
      </identified-content>
      <urgency id="home-page" ed-urg="0" />
      <urgency id="priority" ed-urg="0" />
      <doc-scope id="scope" value="0" />
    </docdata>
    <pubdata type="print" name="HI" date.publication="20261001T000000+5.30" edition.name="NDI" edition.area="NDI" position.section="1MAIN03FNDI" position.sequence="3" ex-ref="1MAIN03FNDI.indd" />
  </head>
  <body boxBorderWeightColor="" boxBorderWeight="">
    <body.head>
      <hedline>
        <hl1 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline1">
          <lang class="3" style="Headline1" font="Franklin Gothic Demi Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="16">Delhi riots 2020</lang>
        </hl1>
        <hl2 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline2">
          <lang class="3" style="Headline2" font="Chronicle Display" fontStyle="Roman" size="37">HC refuses bail to Umar, Sharjeel in UAPA case</lang>
        </hl2>
        <hl3 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline3">
          <lang class="3" style="Headline3" font="Franklin Gothic Demi Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="15"> Asserting that it is bound by judicial discipline, the bench said it cannot modify the Supreme Court’s January 5 order asking the two accused to seek bail either on completion of protected witnesses’ examination or expiry of one year, whichever is earlier</lang>
        </hl3>
      </hedline>
    </body.head>
    <body.content id="Bodytext" CaptionAsBody="0">
      <block>
        <media id="1" media-type="image">
          <media-reference id="tn" source-credit="" data-location="1" source="3khalid_3_NDI_tn.jpg" Units="pixels" width="50" height="50"></media-reference>
        </media>
      </block>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Hans News Service
New Delhi</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">TheDelhi High Court on Wednesday refused to grant bail to activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in a case under the anti-terror law UAPA on the “larger conspiracy” behind the February 2020 riots in north-east Delhi.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">A bench of Justices Prathiba M Singh and Dinesh Bhatt dismissed the third plea for bail by Khalid and Imam in the case. Asserting that it is bound by “judicial discipline”, the bench said it cannot modify the Supreme Court’s January 5 order asking the two accused to seek bail either on completion of protected witnesses’ examination or expiry of one year, whichever is earlier.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">“We would be modifying this (Supreme Court) order if we allow bail, which we cannot do,” the bench remarked. Khalid and Imam challenged the trial court’s July 4 decision rejecting their bail pleas for the third time since their arrest.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">The trial court rejected the bail applications, saying it had “no option but to follow” the Supreme Court’s January 5 order and, therefore, could neither entertain the plea nor grant any relief.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">The bench noted that while denying bail to the two accused in January, the top court had said that their roles were distinct from the other co-accused and they were the “ideological drivers” of the alleged conspiracy.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">“In view of the above discussion and the overall facts of the case, specifically the conditions imposed upon the appellants, this court cannot find fault with the decision of the trial court. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed,” the court concluded.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">The senior counsel appearing for Khalid argued that he has spent six years in custody and was entitled to be released on bail in view of a subsequent top court order giving relief to other co-accused.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">He added that around ten months have passed since the January 5 order and charges were yet to be framed in the trial court. Imam’s counsel also said that he has been in custody for six years and he was entitled to bail considering the delay in conclusion of trial. Additional Solicitor General S V Raju opposed the pleas on behalf of the Delhi Police, asserting that the two are the “masterminds” of the riots and the Supreme Court has already set a timeline for consideration of any fresh bail pleas by them.</lang>
      </p>
      <p style=".Bodylaser">
        <lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">During the hearing, the court also suggested listing the cases for consideration after the second week of January.</lang>
      </p>
    </body.content>
  </body>
</nitf>