<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!--<!DOCTYPE nitf SYSTEM "nitf-3-4.dtd">-->
<nitf>
  <head>
    <title id="Title">#Title</title>
    <docdata management-doc-idref="">
      <date.issue id="CreationDate" norm="" />
      <du-key id="rev-ver" generation="1" version="Default" />
      <du-key id="Parent-Version" version="" />
      <identified-content>
        <classifier id="newspro-nitf" value="r2" />
        <classifier id="Newspro-App" value="Epaper" />
        <classifier id="Content-Type" value="Story" />
        <classifier id="storyID" value="" />
        <classifier id="CmsConID" value="" />
        <classifier id="Desk" value="" />
        <classifier id="Source" value="" />
        <classifier id="Edition" value="" />
        <classifier id="Category" value="-1" />
        <classifier id="UserName" value="" />
        <classifier id="PublicationDate" value="30/09/2026" />
        <classifier id="PublicationName" value="HansIndia" />
        <classifier id="IsPublished" value="Y" />
        <classifier id="IsPlaced" value="Y" />
        <classifier id="IsCompleated" value="N" />
        <classifier id="IsProofed" value="N" />
        <classifier id="User" value="" />
        <classifier id="Headline-Count" value="" />
        <classifier id="Slug-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Photo-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Caption-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Word-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Character-Count" value="0" />
        <classifier id="Location" value="" />
        <classifier id="TemplateType" value="1" />
        <classifier id="StoryType" value="Story" />
        <classifier id="Author" value="" />
        <classifier id="UOM" value="mm" />
		<classifier id="NumCol" value="0" />
        <classifier id="kicker" value="" />
        <classifier id="ByLine" value="" />
        <classifier id="DateLine" value="" />
        <classifier id="box-geometry" value="270,71,955,831" />
         <classifier id="Layer" value="Default"/>
          <classifier id="numcol" value="6"/>
         <classifier id="ArticleStyle" value=""/>
       <classifier id="Epaper-Build" value="7.96.0.0"/>
  <classifier id="ProcessingDateTime" value="Tue Sep 29 2026 19:19:02 GMT+0530"/>
      </identified-content>

      <urgency id="home-page" ed-urg="0" />
      <urgency id="priority" ed-urg="0" />
      <doc-scope id="scope" value="0" />
    </docdata>
    <pubdata type="print" name="HansIndia" date.publication="20260930T000000+5.30" edition.name="BIGBUZZ" edition.area="BBZ" position.section="30MAIN_05BBZ" position.sequence="5" ex-ref="30MAIN_05BBZ.indd" />
  </head>
  <body boxBorderWeightColor="" boxBorderWeight="">
<body.head>
      <hedline>
    	<hl2 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline2">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline2"  font="Franklin Gothic Demi Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="47">Trade pact close, but US tariff changes pose fresh hurdle, says Jaishankar</lang>
	</hl2>
<hl3 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline3">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline3"  font="Franklin Gothic Medium Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="18">EAM says negotiations have reached an advanced stage but Washington’s new Section 301 process remains a factor</lang>
	</hl3>
<hl4 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline4">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline4"  font="Chronicle Display" fontStyle="Roman" size="30">India-China ties better than a 
couple of years ago</lang>
	</hl4>
<hl5 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline5">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline5"  font="Placard Condensed" fontStyle="Regular" size="32">Japan firms eye India for semiconductors, advanced manufacturing</lang>
	</hl5>

       </hedline>
</body.head>
    <body.content id="Bodytext" CaptionAsBody="0">
     <block>
	<media id="1" media-type="image">
		<media-reference id="tn" source-credit="" data-location="1" source="jaishankar_5_BBZ_tn.jpg"  Units="pixels" width="50" height="50"></media-reference>
<media-reference id="tn" source-credit="" data-location="2" source="indiachina_5_BBZ_tn.jpg"  Units="pixels" width="50" height="50"></media-reference>
	</media>
</block>

     <p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">New York</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Theties between India and China are "better" today as compared to a couple of years ago, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has said, underlining that as the border issues are resolved, the relationship returns to normalcy.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Jaishankar was responding to a question on India-China relations, which have seen an upswing in recent times, including with President Xi Jinping's recent visit to India for the BRICS Leaders' Summit hosted by New Delhi. "If you asked me, compared to where you were in 2025, is the relationship better today? I would say yes. Compared to 2024, even more so,” Jaishankar said during a conversation hosted at Asia Society.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">He said it’s not so much a “structural change”, but part of the reason why things have improved is “they had gone so much off-track that the moment you stabilised it, it was going to improve, because after what happened in 2020 and the long standoff that we had on the border, the relationship had really been impacted.” Following the 2020 border standoff between India and China, all “normal contacts" between the two nations had come to a halt, he said, adding that while “trade was continuing”, official exchanges, visa issuance, and flights had been impacted. “So once the border standoff was resolved, it was natural that this would start to improve,” he said.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">There was also this logic, which Delhi had long been conveying to Beijing, that a “standoff between us, a dip in our relationship, actually doesn't help either of us. In fact, it is third parties who will take advantage of that.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">“We also maintained consistently a very elementary principle of statecraft - don't get locked into a problem which benefits others,” Jaishankar said.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">New York</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">A trade agreement between India and the US, if concluded, would contribute to “better” bilateral ties, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said, noting that expectations of rapid progress in negotiations had been “tested” against a much more complex ground reality. Jaishankar addressed prominent members of the Indian-American and diaspora community as well as policy experts on Monday at a special conversation hosted by the Asia Society, as the high-level week of the 81st session of the UN General Assembly concluded in New York.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">During a conversation moderated by former American diplomat and distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute Daniel Russel, Jaishankar was asked about India-US relations, particularly developments related to trade and tariffs over the past year, and what would have to happen to put the bilateral relationship on a “better track”.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">“Well, I think if I stand back and look at the relationship,... I note that much of the world has had a more difficult relationship with the US. I mean that may not be a consolation, but that's a reality,” Jaishankar said. He said one of the issues facing India-US ties was the trade negotiations.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Pointing to the “stakes” and “complexity” involved, Jaishankar said, “Bear in mind, India is a society of small producers, small agriculture producers, small factories. Apart from the per capita gap between India and the United States, the nature of production, nature of society is very different.”</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">“A trade negotiation required a certain amount of ... patience and detailing to see it through… The expectation that it could rapidly move forward, I think, was tested against a ground reality which was much more complex,” he said.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Jaishankar added that “today, we have reached a situation where there is more or less an understanding on the trade agreement”. India and the US had in February announced the finalisation of the framework for the first phase of the bilateral trade agreement. However, changes in the US tariff landscape have led to further negotiations on the pact.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">The US Supreme Court had earlier struck down US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs imposed under emergency powers, prompting Washington to adopt a different tariff framework. In July, the US imposed an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from India under Section 301 of the Trade Act, following a probe into India's measures concerning goods produced with ‘forced labour’.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">The two sides have since continued negotiations on their bilateral trade agreement amid the changes in the US tariff regime.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Jaishankar, alluding to comments by Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal, said the issue now was what had changed on the American side and how the new Section 301 process would affect the agreement.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">“The 301 process is still in the works, it's still unfolding. So the issue for us is at what point do you close out an agreement which is very, very far advanced,” Jaishankar said.</lang>
</p>
<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">“But the period that it took to reach it, that did create bumps last year for the relationship. So presumably, if that agreement is closed out, that would be one point which would contribute to a better relationship,” he said. Jaishankar also said that, to some extent, bilateral ties were impacted and influenced by developments within the US. “For many years mobility was seen as an economic gain. Now, today the economics of mobility and the politics of mobility are at odds with each other,” he said. He said foreign policy or diplomacy today was not just conducted by states, leaders, ministers or diplomats. “In a social media era, there is a very big public opinion factor,” particularly how it plays out in democratic societies, he said.</lang>
</p>

<block id="subarticle1" boxBorderWeightColor="" boxBorderWeight="" style="subarticle" width="1" >

	<hl2 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline2">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline2"  font="Franklin Gothic Demi Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="14">On trade with US </lang>
	</hl2>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Franklin Gothic Medium Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="12">The 301 process is still in the works, it's still unfolding. So the issue for us is at what point do you close out an agreement which is very, very far advanced</lang>
</p>
</block>
<block id="subarticle2" boxBorderWeightColor="" boxBorderWeight="" style="subarticle" width="1" >

	<hl2 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline2">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline2"  font="Franklin Gothic Demi Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="14">On ties with China </lang>
	</hl2>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Franklin Gothic Medium Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="12">If you asked me, compared to where you were in 2025, is the relationship better today? I would say yes. Compared to 2024, even more so</lang>
</p>
</block>
<block id="subarticle3" boxBorderWeightColor="" boxBorderWeight="" style="subarticle" width="1" >

	<hl2 id="Headline1" class="1" style="Headline2">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline2"  font="Franklin Gothic Demi Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="14">On India-Japan ties </lang>
	</hl2>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Franklin Gothic Medium Cond" fontStyle="Regular" size="12">Japanese businesses increasingly saw value in having more than one source of production. Ours with Japan is more investment centric. Japanese firms were looking at ways to use Indian talent and work with Indian companies</lang>
</p>
</block>
<block id="subarticle4" boxBorderWeightColor="" boxBorderWeight="" style="subarticle" width="1" >

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">New York</lang>
</p>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Japanesecompanies are showing greater interest in setting up operations in India, including in semiconductors and advanced manufacturing, as the two countries expand their investment and security ties, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said in New York.</lang>
</p>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Speaking at a New York event, EAM Jaishankar said investment, more than trade alone, defined the economic relationship between India and Japan. He said Japanese businesses increasingly saw value in having more than one source of production. “Ours with Japan is more investment centric,” he said. That investment relationship was growing as companies looked to diversify their supply chains, he added.</lang>
</p>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">EAM Jaishankar identified semiconductors, chemicals and other forms of advanced manufacturing as areas of interest. He said Japanese firms were looking at ways to use Indian talent and work with Indian companies.  “I can see Japanese companies really setting up shop in India,” he said, referring to operations built around those skills and partnerships.</lang>
</p>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">The minister said the relationship was also growing in defence and security. India and Japan were maritime powers with interests in the Indo-Pacific, he said, and their long history of good relations gave that cooperation a firm base.</lang>
</p>

	<p style=".Bodylaser">
	<lang class="3" style=".Bodylaser" font="Minion Pro" fontStyle="Regular" size="9">Japan had been viewed favourably across India’s political spectrum for decades, EAM Jaishankar said.</lang>
</p>
<hl2 id="Headline2" class="1" style="Headline2">
		<lang class="3" style="Headline"  font=""  size=""></lang>
</hl2>
</block>
    </body.content>
  </body>
</nitf>